plugged in luddite
As much as I was trying to avoid it, the inevetable happened. I've now got a cable modem. It was my roommates' idea. It took me three hours of troubleshooting on my own, and another hour-plus on the phone with a couple of people from RCN. That nasty 169.255... address kept wedging itself into my tcp/ip. But now I'm finally speeding along. Which is odd for a turtle. To be speeding, that is. I'm listening to a streaming techno station on MP3.com, and I already downloaded the new Episode II trailer. Aren't you impressed? Nah, me either.
So, the bad thing about the cable modem is that it took valuable time away from the important project. The zine is really, really, almost done now. And with the very visceral deadline of tomorrow (in time for the Nader thing on Saturday), I have to put aside my tendency to nitpick over little niggling details, like I usually do when it comes to art.
A thought occured to me today. If it is legal, in times of war, to kill people, even non-military civillains and diplomats and such, then would it be alright, legally, if someone (not me, of course) from God Bless America™ decided to off George Dubya? Does this war-exception extend to anyone, or do you have to align yourself with the opposition (opening yourself up to attack also)? It seems like there must be some provision to protect from this, but there could be some legal grounds for defense in such a case.
This all brings me to my final point of the evening. How is it that declaration of war suddenly makes murder AOK? A government can up and invade another country, kill as many people as it sees fit, demand obedience from the country's citizens, and implement its own form of government and officials. As long as its got the backing of a majority of the other coutries with the big guns, then its completely legal. What am I missing here? Sure, I can buy the defense argument. If someone rolls into my community waving around a big ole' tank and scaring the cats, I can accept that the National Guard is gonna come in and try to make the evil tank-people go away. But Nicaragua, Cuba, Vietnam? Those were completely unprovoked assaults on our part. Heck, even Afghanastan, since we still don't seem to have any proof who was behind the hijackings, except for a few Saudis and Indians with a death wish. How is it that we can ethically condemn "them" for killing people, when we are doing the same thing ourselves?
I'll leave you with that one to contemplate, while I go play with fonts...